Compare TwinBASIC with other Clones of VB6 (Answered from Perplexity AI)
#TwinBASIC stands out among VB6 clones due to its focus on 100% compatibility with existing VB6 and VBA code while also modernizing the language[1][4]. Here's how it compares to other VB6 alternatives:
## Compatibility
TwinBASIC aims for complete compatibility with VB6 and VBA, including support for:
- Importing #VB6 project files[2]
- Replicating VB6/VBA quirks and features[4]
- OLE/COM/ActiveX model as its native model[2]
In contrast, alternatives like Gambas and Xojo (RealBASIC) lack full VB6 compatibility[2].
## Modern Features
TwinBASIC adds numerous modern features beyond VB6 capabilities:
- 64-bit compilation
- Multithreading support
- DLL creation
- Generics (more flexible than VB.NET)
- Method overloading
- New datatypes (LongLong, LongPtr, Decimal)
- Unicode support[4]
## Development Environment
- Integrates with Visual Studio Code[1]
- Dedicated IDE for smoother development[4]
- Language server support (currently on hold)[2]
## Performance and Deployment
- Generates small executables without runtime libraries[4]
- Improved form engine performance[3]
- Enhanced IDispatch implementation for better late-bound code performance[3]
## Comparison with Specific Alternatives
1. VB.NET:
- TwinBASIC offers better compatibility with VB6/VBA
- No dependency on .NET framework versions[1]
2. RAD Basic:
- TwinBASIC shows faster progress and better support for complex applications[5]
- More complete implementation of VB6 features[5]
3. Gambas and Xojo:
- TwinBASIC provides superior VB6 compatibility and import capabilities[2]
4. GNOME Basic:
- TwinBASIC has active development and a more robust foundation[2]
TwinBASIC's combination of VB6/VBA compatibility, modern features, and active development makes it a strong contender among VB6 clones, particularly for those looking to modernize existing VB6 applications.
Citations:
[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/vba/comments/mq87ly/twinbasic_modern_basic_compiler_fully_compatible/
[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31976614
[3] https://nolongerset.com/twinbasic-update-september-8-2024/
[4] https://twinbasic.com
[5] https://www.vbforums.com/showthread.php?895421-RAD-Basic-vs-TwinBasic-Which-do-you-prefer%2Fpage2=
[6] https://brianlovin.com/hn/31976614
[7] https://rcbasic.freeforums.net/thread/492/twinbasic-rad-basic?page=1
[8] https://github.com/twinbasic/twinbasic/issues/75
---
Antwort von Perplexity: pplx.ai/share
#TwinBASIC stands out among VB6 clones due to its focus on 100% compatibility with existing VB6 and VBA code while also modernizing the language[1][4]. Here's how it compares to other VB6 alternatives:
## Compatibility
TwinBASIC aims for complete compatibility with VB6 and VBA, including support for:
- Importing #VB6 project files[2]
- Replicating VB6/VBA quirks and features[4]
- OLE/COM/ActiveX model as its native model[2]
In contrast, alternatives like Gambas and Xojo (RealBASIC) lack full VB6 compatibility[2].
## Modern Features
TwinBASIC adds numerous modern features beyond VB6 capabilities:
- 64-bit compilation
- Multithreading support
- DLL creation
- Generics (more flexible than VB.NET)
- Method overloading
- New datatypes (LongLong, LongPtr, Decimal)
- Unicode support[4]
## Development Environment
- Integrates with Visual Studio Code[1]
- Dedicated IDE for smoother development[4]
- Language server support (currently on hold)[2]
## Performance and Deployment
- Generates small executables without runtime libraries[4]
- Improved form engine performance[3]
- Enhanced IDispatch implementation for better late-bound code performance[3]
## Comparison with Specific Alternatives
1. VB.NET:
- TwinBASIC offers better compatibility with VB6/VBA
- No dependency on .NET framework versions[1]
2. RAD Basic:
- TwinBASIC shows faster progress and better support for complex applications[5]
- More complete implementation of VB6 features[5]
3. Gambas and Xojo:
- TwinBASIC provides superior VB6 compatibility and import capabilities[2]
4. GNOME Basic:
- TwinBASIC has active development and a more robust foundation[2]
TwinBASIC's combination of VB6/VBA compatibility, modern features, and active development makes it a strong contender among VB6 clones, particularly for those looking to modernize existing VB6 applications.
Citations:
[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/vba/comments/mq87ly/twinbasic_modern_basic_compiler_fully_compatible/
[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31976614
[3] https://nolongerset.com/twinbasic-update-september-8-2024/
[4] https://twinbasic.com
[5] https://www.vbforums.com/showthread.php?895421-RAD-Basic-vs-TwinBasic-Which-do-you-prefer%2Fpage2=
[6] https://brianlovin.com/hn/31976614
[7] https://rcbasic.freeforums.net/thread/492/twinbasic-rad-basic?page=1
[8] https://github.com/twinbasic/twinbasic/issues/75
---
Antwort von Perplexity: pplx.ai/share